The layout only survives demo copy
Use realistic lengths and inspect overflow, wrapping, tables and fixed panels at 390 px.
Real-flow QA for v0 interfaces
Review a v0 interface with long content and navigate it with a keyboard. The automated check inspects accessible structure, layout and observable control responses. Preparing different datasets and fully testing keyboard flows remain part of the manual checklist.
Review these scenarios before sharing. The automated report records observable issues on the pages you select.
Use realistic lengths and inspect overflow, wrapping, tables and fixed panels at 390 px.
Test focus, keyboard use, field labels, heading order and accessible names for icon controls.
Follow the CTA to its outcome and separate a real flow from a control that only opens a mock state.
Use this sequence alongside the report to review behavior that depends on your business rules and data.
You get evidence-backed presentation, accessibility and action issues—not subjective pixel preferences—with exact fix locations.
Open a sample reportHeadings and landmarks explain the screen without visual cues.
Focus is visible, order is logical and dialogs do not trap the user.
Meaning, action and readable width stay intact.
Every primary control leads to a real next state.
What the run can and cannot prove.
Priority goes to observable failures: overlap, unreadability, missing focus, broken actions or incorrect hierarchy.
Yes. The component library matters less than the behavior of the published page.